LAPD says serial killer suspect may have more victims









Los Angeles police officials said they plan to comb through scores of old unsolved murders to see whether a reputed 72-year-old serial killer carried out slayings in the city beyond the three women he is suspected of killing in the 1980s.


Samuel Little, who authorities allege also killed women in Florida and Mississippi, currently is being held at California's Wasco state prison. He was charged Monday and is expected to return to Los Angeles for arraignment this week on the counts of murder with special circumstances.


LAPD's cold case homicide detectives now plan to take a methodical look at evidence from scores of unsolved murder and death cases dating back to the 1980s and early 1990s to determine whether Little may have been involved.








Prosecutors have charged Little in connection to three L.A. killings that appear to be sexually motivated strangulations: Carol Alford, 41, found dead on July 13, 1987; Audrey Nelson, 35, whose body was discovered Aug. 14, 1989; and Guadalupe Apodaca, 46, found Sept. 2, 1989. Their bodies were discovered in the Central Avenue-Alameda Street corridor, just south of downtown, although police have not released the exact locations where the victims were found.


LAPD detectives Mitzi Roberts and Rick Jackson, who investigated the cases, said there is DNA evidence linking Little, but declined to elaborate further because of the ongoing investigation. Roberts and Jackson spent months criss-crossing the country following Little’s path.


Two years ago, the LAPD arrested a man they said was the notorious “Grim Sleeper,” allegedly responsible for at least 10 slayings in South L.A. After his arrest, LAPD detectives examined hundreds of unsolved deaths involving women in the city with "high-risk lifestyles."


Detectives said they will focus on sexually motivated strangulations. But they also expect inquiries from law enforcement agencies around the country because Little has a criminal record in 24 states dating back to the 1950s.


Detectives said they believe he committed thefts during the day to make money to finance the bar-hopping that brought him into contact with his alleged victims.


“It was theft by day and murder by night,” Jackson said.


Little, who also used the name Samuel McDowell, served relatively little time in state prison or county jail, the detectives said. In the early 1980s, he was accused of two murders and two attempted murders in Gainesville, Fla., and Pascagoula, Miss.


Little was acquitted by a Florida jury in the strangulation death of Patricia Ann Mount, 26, whose body was discovered Sept. 12, 1982.


He was never brought to trial in the Mississippi cases, which include the strangulation death of Melinda LaPree, 24, on Sept. 14, 1982. That case has been reopened by the Pascagoula Police Department in light of new evidence, authorities said.


Little moved from the South to California in the mid-1980s, settling first in San Diego.


He served more than two years in state prison after being convicted of assault and false imprisonment of two San Diego women in separate cases, police said. Shortly after being paroled, he moved to Los Angeles.





Read More..

Raspberry Pi Quickly Approaches 1 Million Units Sold











The Raspberry Pi Foundation announced yesterday that Element14, a division of electronics maker Premier Farnell, has manufactured their 500,000th Raspberry Pi unit — an impressive pace for the $35 bare-board Linux computer that was released in February of 2012.


The milestone becomes even more noteworthy when coupled with the fact that they utilize a second manufacturer as well, RS Components. The team behind the tiny computers make note of the implication in their announcement, stating, “We don’t have completely up-to-date figures from RS Components yet, but Farnell’s news suggests that we’re well on the way to having sold our millionth Raspberry Pi.”


A million units sold at $35 amounts to $35 million dollars, which amounts to a massive success, and that’s before adding in additional revenue from accessory and case sales. The feat is noteworthy considering that message boards and Twitter feeds are often brimming with complaints about retailers being sold out of the diminutive computer boards.


In commemoration of the quickly approaching milestone, Raspberry Pi published an infographic from Element14 about their board sales, including a note that if stacked up end-to-end, the tower would rise 25.6 miles — a mile and a half higher than Felix Baumgartner’s RedBull Stratos space jump.


The chiefs at the Raspberry Pi Foundation are understandably excited by the results of the partnership. “Since the Raspberry Pi was launched globally in February 2012 it has been a tremendous success story,” says Eben Upton, co-founder of the Raspberry Pi Foundation. “The younger generation has demonstrated significant intrigue in learning how to build and program their own computer device. And what has been great to see is the enormous growth in the hobbyist market. I have seen projects from Twittering chickens to home beer-brewing kits being created using the Raspberry Pi and its accessories.”


Not content to rest, the Raspberry Pi Foundation is partnering with Element 14 to distribute the product worldwide in 2013, further spreading the seeds of the creative computer. While busy expanding their global footprint, Element 14 is also proud to have relocated their manufacturing lines from China to England, proving that high-volume consumer electronics can be produced in the west.


Illustration: Element14 




Joseph Flaherty writes about design, DIY, and the intersection of physical and digital products. He designs award-winning medical devices and apps for smartphones at AgaMatrix, including the first FDA-cleared medical device that connects to the iPhone.

Read more by Joseph Flaherty

Follow @josephflaherty on Twitter.



Read More..

Oprah to interview Armstrong for Jan. 17 show






LOS ANGELES (AP) — Lance Armstrong has agreed to an interview with Oprah Winfrey in which he is to address allegations he used performance-enhancing drugs during a career in which he won seven Tour de France titles.


According to Winfrey’s website on Tuesday, this will be a “no holds-barred interview.” It will be the first with Armstrong since his cycling career crumbled under the weight of a massive report by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency. The report detailed accusations of drug use by Armstrong and teammates on his U.S. Postal Service teams.






It’s unclear if the interview at Armstrong’s home in Austin, Texas, has already been taped. Nicole Nichols, a spokeswoman for Oprah Winfrey Network & Harpo Studios, declined comment.


The show will be broadcast Jan. 17 at 9 p.m. EST on OWN and Oprah.com.


Armstrong has strongly denied the doping charges that led to him being stripped of his Tour de France titles, but The New York Times reported Friday he has told associates he is considering acknowledging the use of performance enhancers.


The newspaper report cited anonymous sources, and Armstrong lawyer Tim Herman told The Associated Press that night he had no knowledge of Armstrong considering a confession.


Earlier Tuesday, “60 Minutes Sports” reported the head of USADA told the show a representative for Armstrong offered the agency a “donation” in excess of $ 150,000 several years before an investigation by the organization led to the loss of Armstrong’s Tour de France titles.


In an interview for the premiere on Showtime on Wednesday night, USADA chief executive Travis Tygart said he was “stunned” when he received the offer in 2004.


“It was a clear conflict of interest for USADA,” Tygart said. “We had no hesitation in rejecting that offer.”


Herman denied such an offer was made.


“No truth to that story,” Herman wrote Tuesday in an email to the AP. “First Lance heard of it was today. He never made any such contribution or suggestion.”


Tygart was traveling and did not respond to requests from the AP for comment. USADA spokeswoman Annie Skinner said Tygart’s comments from the interview were accurate. In it, he reiterates what he told the AP last fall: He was surprised when federal investigators abruptly closed their two-year investigation into Armstrong and his business dealings, then refused to share any evidence they gathered.


“You’ll have to ask the feds why they shut down,” Tygart told the AP. “They enforce federal criminal laws. We enforce sports anti-doping violations. They’re totally separate. We’ve done our job.”


Entertainment News Headlines – Yahoo! News





Title Post: Oprah to interview Armstrong for Jan. 17 show
Url Post: http://www.news.fluser.com/oprah-to-interview-armstrong-for-jan-17-show/
Link To Post : Oprah to interview Armstrong for Jan. 17 show
Rating:
100%

based on 99998 ratings.
5 user reviews.
Author: Fluser SeoLink
Thanks for visiting the blog, If any criticism and suggestions please leave a comment




Read More..

Economic Scene: Health Care and Pursuit of Profit Make a Poor Mix





Thirty years ago, Bonnie Svarstad and Chester Bond of the School of Pharmacy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison discovered an interesting pattern in the use of sedatives at nursing homes in the south of the state.




Patients entering church-affiliated nonprofit homes were prescribed drugs roughly as often as those entering profit-making “proprietary” institutions. But patients in proprietary homes received, on average, more than four times the dose of patients at nonprofits.


Writing about his colleagues’ research in his 1988 book “The Nonprofit Economy,” the economist Burton Weisbrod provided a straightforward explanation: “differences in the pursuit of profit.” Sedatives are cheap, Mr. Weisbrod noted. “Less expensive than, say, giving special attention to more active patients who need to be kept busy.”


This behavior was hardly surprising. Hospitals run for profit are also less likely than nonprofit and government-run institutions to offer services like home health care and psychiatric emergency care, which are not as profitable as open-heart surgery.


A shareholder might even applaud the creativity with which profit-seeking institutions go about seeking profit. But the consequences of this pursuit might not be so great for other stakeholders in the system — patients, for instance. One study found that patients’ mortality rates spiked when nonprofit hospitals switched to become profit-making, and their staff levels declined.


These profit-maximizing tactics point to a troubling conflict of interest that goes beyond the private delivery of health care. They raise a broader, more important question: How much should we rely on the private sector to satisfy broad social needs?


From health to pensions to education, the United States relies on private enterprise more than pretty much every other advanced, industrial nation to provide essential social services. The government pays Medicare Advantage plans to deliver health care to aging Americans. It provides a tax break to encourage employers to cover workers under 65.


Businesses devote almost 6 percent of the nation’s economic output to pay for health insurance for their employees. This amounts to nine times similar private spending on health benefits across the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, on average. Private plans cover more than a third of pension benefits. The average for 30 countries in the O.E.C.D. is just over one-fifth.


We let the private sector handle tasks other countries would never dream of moving outside the government’s purview. Consider bail bondsmen and their rugged sidekicks, the bounty hunters.


American TV audiences may reminisce fondly about Lee Majors in “The Fall Guy” chasing bad guys in a souped-up GMC truck — a cheap way to get felons to court. People in most other nations see them as an undue commercial intrusion into the criminal justice system that discriminates against the poor.


Our reliance on private enterprise to provide the most essential services stems, in part, from a more narrow understanding of our collective responsibility to provide social goods. Private American health care has stood out for decades among industrial nations, where public universal coverage has long been considered a right of citizenship. But our faith in private solutions also draws on an ingrained belief that big government serves too many disparate objectives and must cater to too many conflicting interests to deliver services fairly and effectively.


Our trust appears undeserved, however. Our track record suggests that handing over responsibility for social goals to private enterprise is providing us with social goods of lower quality, distributed more inequitably and at a higher cost than if government delivered or paid for them directly.


The government’s most expensive housing support program — it will cost about $140 billion this year — is a tax break for individuals to buy homes on the private market.


According to the Tax Policy Center, this break will benefit only 20 percent of mostly well-to-do taxpayers, and most economists agree that it does nothing to further its purported goal of increasing homeownership. Tax breaks for private pensions also mostly benefit the wealthy. And 401(k) plans are riskier and costlier to administer than Social Security.


From the high administrative costs incurred by health insurers to screen out sick patients to the array of expensive treatments prescribed by doctors who earn more money for every treatment they provide, our private health care industry provides perhaps the clearest illustration of how the profit motive can send incentives astray.


By many objective measures, the mostly private American system delivers worse value for money than every other in the developed world. We spend nearly 18 percent of the nation’s economic output on health care and still manage to leave tens of millions of Americans without adequate access to care.


Britain gets universal coverage for 10 percent of gross domestic product. Germany and France for 12 percent. What’s more, our free market for health services produces no better health than the public health care systems in other advanced nations. On some measures — infant mortality, for instance — it does much worse.


In a way, private delivery of health care misleads Americans about the financial burdens they must bear to lead an adequate existence. If they were to consider the additional private spending on health care as a form of tax — an indispensable cost to live a healthy life — the nation’s tax bill would rise to about 31 percent from 25 percent of the nation’s G.D.P. — much closer to the 34 percent average across the O.E.C.D.


A quarter of a century ago, a belief swept across America that we could reduce the ballooning costs of the government’s health care entitlements just by handing over their management to the private sector. Private companies would have a strong incentive to identify and wipe out wasteful treatment. They could encourage healthy lifestyles among beneficiaries, lowering use of costly care. Competition for government contracts would keep the overall price down.


We now know this didn’t work as advertised. Competition wasn’t as robust as hoped. Health maintenance organizations didn’t keep costs in check, and they spent heavily on administration and screening to enroll only the healthiest, most profitable beneficiaries.


One study of Medicare spending found that the program saved no money by relying on H.M.O.’s. Another found that moving Medicaid recipients into H.M.O.’s increased the average cost per beneficiary by 12 percent with no improvement in the quality of care for the poor. Two years ago, President Obama’s health care law cut almost $150 billion from Medicare simply by reducing payments to private plans that provide similar care to plain vanilla Medicare at a higher cost.


Today, again, entitlements are at the center of the national debate. Our elected officials are consumed by slashing a budget deficit that is expected to balloon over coming decades. With both Democrats and Republicans unwilling to raise taxes on the middle class, the discussion is quickly boiling down to how deeply entitlements must be cut.


We may want to broaden the debate. The relevant question is how best we can serve our social needs at the lowest possible cost. One answer is that we have a lot of room to do better. Improving the delivery of social services like health care and pensions may be possible without increasing the burden on American families, simply by removing the profit motive from the equation.


E-mail: eporter@nytimes.com;


Twitter: @portereduardo



Read More..

DealBook: S.E.C. Enforcement Chief, Robert Khuzami, Steps Down

Robert Khuzami, a former terrorism prosecutor who revamped the Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement unit, is stepping down from the agency after an aggressive four-tenure.

His departure signals the end of an important chapter in the history of the agency, which has been praised for taking significant actions against some of Wall Street’s largest banks after the financial crisis but also scrutinized for not suing top bank executives at those firms.

After joining the S.E.C. in 2009, Mr. Khuzami reinvigorated the enforcement team, which was maligned for missing the warning signs of the financial crisis and Bernard L. Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Mr. Khuzami, an imposing presence with a piercing stare, reorganized the management ranks, fashioning specialized units to track complex corners of Wall Street, and applied aggressive prosecutorial tactics to civil cases. In recent years, the enforcement division notched a record number of actions, many against banks at the center of the crisis.

“They know we’re out there, and we’re smarter and can cover more ground,” Mr. Khuzami said in an interview. He announced his departure to staff in an e-mail on Wednesday and is set to depart in about two weeks.

Mr. Khuzami’s successor, who has not been named, faces challenges. The enforcement unit must contend with the increasingly influential rapid-fire trading firms that, by some accounts, have introduced instability to the stock market.

The unit also faces lingering questions about its negotiating tactics. Some consumer advocates complain that the agency’s headline-grabbing settlements let Wall Street off the hook. Mr. Khuzami’s unit notably butted heads with a prominent federal judge in New York, Jed S. Rakoff, who in 2010 called the agency’s $150 million settlement with Bank of America over lax public disclosures “half-baked justice at best.”

Mr. Khuzami’s departure, part of a broader exodus from the S.E.C. following the resignation of its chairwoman, Mary L. Schapiro, raises further questions about the future of the unit. The move, at the very least, adds to the gap in the S.E.C.’s roster.

The agency has witnessed a wave of turnover in recent weeks, with the head of trading and markets and the director of corporation finance both leaving. Elisse B. Walter, Ms. Schapiro’s replacement, named interim replacements for those spots.

But the enforcement division, officials say, could struggle under a provisional leader. The enforcement chief, they note, sets the tone for Wall Street oversight.

Ms. Walter is weighing a short list of candidates to replace Mr. Khuzami, according to people briefed on the matter. The list includes Mr. Khuzami’s current deputy, George Canellos, and the enforcement division’s chief litigation counsel, Matthew Martens.

With Mr. Khuzami gone, the field of contenders to replace Ms. Schapiro is also shifting. President Obama awarded the job to Ms. Walter, a Democrat who became an S.E.C. commissioner in 2008, but her term expires at the end of 2013.

Mr. Khuzami, a political independent described as alternately harsh and playful with his employees, built a loyal following among some enforcement division officials who hoped he would win the chairman post. He opted instead to position himself for a lucrative spot at a white-shoe law firm.

“I don’t know what I’m doing next, but I loved the last four years and I’m sad it’s ending,” he said in the interview.

Mr. Khuzami, a Rochester native with a bohemian upbringing, followed an unlikely path to the S.E.C. His parents were ballroom dancers; his sister a muralist. They jokingly refer to Mr. Khuzami as “the white sheep” of the family.

He put himself through school with odd jobs, as a dishwasher, bartender, overnight dockworker. After graduating from Boston University law school, he was hired as a junior lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft in New York.

Mr. Khuzami tried out for the United States attorney’s office under Rudy Giuliani, but missed the cut. When the office eventually hired him in the early 1990s, he was assigned to terrorism prosecutions. The move led to a career-defining case — the conviction of the so-called “Blind Sheik,” a Muslim leader tied the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. He later ran a securities task force.

But after more than a decade as a prosecutor, he departed for Deutsche Bank, where he eventually became general counsel of the firm’s American arm.

In 2009, he landed on Ms. Schapiro’s radar screen. She was searching for an aggressive personality to shake up the enforcement team, a demoralized group criticized for missing the warning signs of the crisis.

“It had to be someone who was a great prosecutor,” Ms. Schapiro said in an interview.

Their relationship began with an awkward meeting. Mr. Khuzami, having dressed in the dark to catch a predawn plane to Washington, wore mismatched shoes of different colors. And at the end of the interview, without an explicit offer, he was unsure whether he won the position. Finally, after days of silence, Ms. Schapiro phoned him to ask: “Are you taking the job or not?”

Mr. Khuzami soon hatched a game plan for overhauling — some officials called it “dismantling” — the division.

He arrived in Washington with strategies imported from the United States attorney’s office. Mr. Khuzami pushed the S.E.C. to offer leniency for cooperating witnesses and to strike deferred-prosecution agreements to companies that promised to behave. The tools, he said, are “game changers” for unearthing fraud.

He also poached former prosecutors for his staff, including Lorin L. Reisner, Mr. Khuzami’s friend from the United States attorney’s office, who joined as the top deputy. Mr. Khuzami plucked other new hires from Wall Street, including traders and compliance officers. Adam Storch, then a 29-year-old Goldman Sachs vice president, became the unit’s first chief operating officer.

Under the new regime, the enforcement team eliminated a layer of management, moving senior lawyers onto the front lines of investigations. Mr. Khuzami mandated, for the first time, that all enforcement employees carry a BlackBerry, holding them accountable beyond the 9-5 workday.

Mr. Khuzami also built specialties among his staff, a strategy he picked up at Deutsche Bank. He created an Office of Market Intelligence to analyze and triage tips and complaints from investors. He then opened five units that tracked some of the darkest corners of finance, focusing on structured products like derivatives, market abuse like insider trading and the secretive world of hedge fund returns.

“The changes were necessary and dramatic,” Ms. Schapiro said.

Mr. Khuzami introduced the broad outlines of reform in May 2009 at a retreat in Solomons Island, Md., an annual gathering of senior enforcement officials. “It’s time to get serious about change,” he said, according to attendees.

But the message provoked concerns among enforcement lawyers, who lined up at microphones to question the nuances of new procedures and complain about potential violations of their contracts. A few top officials, some who were widely respected, were about to be left at the sidelines under his regime.

“Everyone in the office was scared, but we also started working harder,” said Thomas Sporkin, who ran the Office of Market Intelligence until last year, when he departed the agency.

The group faced some growing pains, as it adjusted to Mr. Khuzami’s management style. He had a harsh streak and a knack for aggressively grilling lawyers about the nuances of enforcement cases, according to staff members. But they also recalled a softer side. He invited employees to his family Christmas party, they say, and went to motorcycle safety school with Mr. Canellos.

As a motivational tool, he would often publicly perform for his staff. At a swearing-in ceremony for new members, he quoted poetry from Gwendolyn Brooks. Mr. Khuzami also once donned a red wig to sing a version of the “Annie” theme song “Tomorrow,” with lyrics twisted to fit the S.E.C., at an annual awards ceremony.

“Even though he scares the hell out of people,” one employee said, “you like him because he’s genuine.”

Mr. Khuzami’s tactics appeared to bear fruit. Under his tenure, the unit leveled more charges than in any comparable four-year period, including a record number of enforcement actions in 2011. They also mounted 150 actions against people and firms tied to the crisis.

Mr. Khuzami emphasized that the unit was tracking bigger game. The agency has taken aim at billionaire hedge fund managers, including Philip Falcone, and filed complex cases involving collateralized debt obligations, a crackdown that ensnared some of the biggest names on Wall Street. At the urging of Mr. Khuzami and Mr. Reisner, the S.E.C. brought a landmark fraud case against Goldman Sachs, netting a record settlement in excess of $500 million.

“He’s really broadened the net,” said Mary Jo White, a white-collar criminal defense lawyer at Debevoise who was Mr. Khuzami’s boss when she was the United States attorney in Manhattan.

Some consumer advocates say the enforcement unit remains too timid. They complain that it opted not to charge Lehman Brothers executives and went soft on firms like Bank of America and Citigroup. Judge Rakoff refused to bless the $285 million Citigroup deal, calling the penalty “pocket change.”

Critics also question why the S.E.C. sued only a handful of top executives who ran companies at the center of the credit crisis.

“If you’re rich and connected on Wall Street, then don’t worry about the S.E.C,” said Dennis M. Kelleher, the head of Better Markets, a nonprofit advocacy group critical of the financial industry.

Mr. Khuzami dismissed the grumbling, saying, “The critics ought to take comfort in that we’re not reluctant to charge high-ranking individuals.” The agency, he noted, sued 65 senior executives involved in the crisis, including the leaders of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and most major mortgage companies that caused the housing bubble. The cases involving big banks, he said, lacked sufficient evidence implicating chief executives.

And despite their differences, even Judge Rakoff credits Mr. Khuzami with a rapid turnaround of the enforcement division.

“Although, from our different perspectives, Rob Khuzami and I sharply disagree about some matters, overall I think he has done a terrific job,” Judge Rakoff said. “Most important, he has restored a sense of pride and purpose to the S.E.C. enforcement division, and we are all the better for it.”

Read More..

Testimony about Colorado massacre resumes in James Holmes hearing

More emotional testimony was expected at a hearing on the Aurora movie theater massacre, as prosecutors continued to lay out their case against the defendant, James Holmes.









CENTENNIAL, Colo. — Vivid testimony about the movie theater massacre that shocked a nation extended into a second day as a preliminary hearing for James E. Holmes resumed Tuesday.


Prosecutors continued to lay out their case against Holmes, 25, accused of killing 12 people and injuring about 70 during a shooting rampage on July 20 in a suburban cinema. At issue in the proceeding, expected to last a week, is whether there is a sufficient case to go to trial.


In the first day of testimony Monday, law enforcement officials described the bloody shooting scene and heartbreaking rescue attempts to bring the gravely wounded to treatment.








PHOTOS: Colorado movie theater shooting


The prosecution has been trying to show that Holmes acted deliberately while the defense in cross-examination has focused on how the former neuroscience graduate student appeared emotionally detached, bolstering their expected insanity presentation.


Throughout, Holmes has sat impassive, while some of the victims' relatives have wept during the more graphic testimony.

On Tuesday, the atmosphere at the Arapahoe County Court House contained less of the frenzy that marked the first day. Yet the proceedings come as the debate over gun control has heated up in the wake of the attack last month in Newtown, Conn., in which 20 children and six adults were killed by a lone gunman who invaded the Sandy Hook Elementary School. The gunman first killed his mother in their home and ended his shooting spree by killing himself.


WHO THEY WERE: Aurora theater shooting


Tuesday’s testimony also comes as the nation commemorates the second anniversary of the Tucson shooting where six died and 13 were injured when gunman Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot where former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was holding a meet-and-greet with her constituents. Tucson, which has had events for several days, will mark the exact time of the shooting with the ringing of bells across the city at the moment of the morning attack.


Giffords, who went through a painful recovery and rehabilitation for gun wounds to the head, has become a spokeswoman for greater gun control. She and her husband, former astronaut Mark Kelly, announced they would raise money to support gun control efforts. The pair visited Newtown last week.


On Monday, Aurora police testified about the horrors they found in the theater, including blood-soaked aisles and walls, crumpled bodies, and scores of spent shell casings.

TIMELINE: U.S. mass shootings


The prosecution also showed surveillance video of Holmes entering the theater complex just past midnight. He had purchased his ticket 12 days earlier. The chilling, soundless video shows Holmes redeeming his ticket at a kiosk, giving it to a ticket taker, then lingering near the concession stand for a few minutes before turning toward Theater 9, where the Batman movie, “The Dark Knight Rises” was playing.


Prosecutors have yet to announce whether they will seek the death penalty.


ALSO:


Supreme Court rejects challenge to Obama stem cell policy


Chicago man fatally poisoned a month after hitting lotto jackpot


Alabama police: High school white supremacist planned bomb attack


Deam reported from Centennial, Colo.; Muskal reported from Los Angeles. 








Read More..

First Look: Eye-Catching Tech at 'Digital Experience'











Today may officially mark the first day of CES, but we’ve already got a good idea of what’s in store thanks to pre-show events like Monday evening’s Digital Experience. Over 200 companies showcase their latest innovations — everything from tech notables like Acer and Samsung to up-and-comers like Nest and Lark.


With that many companies on exhibit, there’s a lot of noise. But the Gadget Lab staff scoured each jam-packed aisle to discover some of the best gems of 2013, including a gigantic Huawei phone, new LEGO Mindstorms, and a music-controlled back massager. Watch the video above to check it out!






Read More..

‘Downton,’ ‘Girls,’ ‘Idol’ and more this January






NEW YORK (AP) — Where once the post-holiday schedule was a blizzard of chilly reruns, January is aburst with premieres and finales.


Already, the much-adored British miniseries “Downton Abbey” has made its much-awaited season return Sundays on PBS.






On IFC on Fridays, the hilarious “Portlandia” is back for its third season of sketch comedy poking fun at the peculiarities of Portland, Ore., starring Fred Armisen and Carrie Brownstein.


And NBC‘s mystery melodrama “Deception” has arrived on Mondays. Meagan Good stars as a detective going undercover at the home of a rich family with whom she was once friendly, to investigate a murder within the clan.


On Tuesday, PBS’ “American Experience” begins a three-week documentary miniseries, “The Abolitionists,” spotlighting Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, John Brown and Angelina Grimke.


Also on Tuesday, the FX drama “Justified” is returning for its fourth season of Kentucky hill-country crime-fighting led by Deputy U.S. Marshal Raylan Givens (series star Timothy Olyphant).


On Thursday, comedic action centers at the White House with the premiere of NBC‘s “1600 Penn.” Josh Gad (“The Book of Mormon”) stars as the goofball son of the incumbent U.S. president (played by Bill Pullman) who keeps the first family in a stir, yet manages to make everything turn out all right by the final fade-out.


The Gallaghers of “Shameless” are a much different family. In this dark comedy, William H. Macy stars as the boozy single father of a brood of kids who manage their ragtag Chicago homestead in spite of Dad’s overindulgences. Also starring Emmy Rossum, it returns Jan. 13 for its third season on Showtime.


Also on Jan. 13, HBO’s comedy “Girls” returns for a second season sure to be at least as ballyhooed, discussed and argued about as the first. Lena Dunham (who also writes, produces, directs and created the series) stars as one of a quartet of twentysomething gal pals in New York.


Right after “Girls,” HBO launches the second season of “Enlightened,” an affecting comedy starring Laura Dern as a confused New Age-y activist who’s bent on changing the world.


What was Carrie Bradshaw like before Sarah Jessica Parker and “Sex and the City”? Find out on “The Carrie Diaries,” which debuts on the CW on Jan. 14. AnnaSophia Robb stars as the high-school era Carrie in this likable prequel.


“American Idol” returns on Jan. 16 on Fox. Veteran judge Randy Jackson will be joined by Mariah Carey, Nicki Minaj and Keith Urban. Ryan Seacrest, as always, is the affable host.


After five seasons, Fox’s lovably inscrutable sci-fi series “Fringe” concludes its head-scratching run on Jan. 18. Stars include Anna Torv, Joshua Jackson and John Noble.


Fox’s bloody suspense drama “The Following” premieres Jan. 21. Kevin Bacon stars as a former FBI agent drafted back into service to chase a serial murderer and his vicious disciples.


My, how Spartacus‘ army has grown! Commanding thousands of freed slaves, Spartacus is primed to bring down the entire Roman Republic as the final season begins for “Spartacus: War of the Damned,” Jan. 25 on Starz. Liam McIntyre plays the rebel leader.


The world of “Dallas” will be rocked during its second season with the death of arch-villain oilman J.R. Ewing (played, of course, by Larry Hagman, who passed away in November while the series was in production). Also starring Patrick Duffy and Linda Gray, this rebooted (so to speak) version of the long-running CBS prime-time soap returns on TNT on Jan. 28.


FX weighs in with an edgy new drama “The Americans” on Jan. 30. It stars Matthew Rhys and Keri Russell as two KGB agents posing as the heads of a normal American household in the 1980s, as they work tirelessly to bring down the U.S. on behalf of Mother Russia.


On Jan. 31, NBC unveils a new medical drama “Do No Harm.” Steve Pasquale (“Rescue Me”) stars as a neurosurgeon with a great bedside manner who inconveniently shares a body with his sociopathic alter ego.


The same night, NBC closes the book on the brilliant mockery of “30 Rock.” This Tina Fey comedy wraps seven seasons of making fun of pop culture, modern life and especially its own real-life broadcast network — which, like the rest of the TV universe, has even more midseason goodies in store come February.


___


EDITOR’S NOTE — Frazier Moore is a national television columnist for The Associated Press. He can be reached at fmoore(at)ap.org and at http://www.twitter.com/tvfrazier


Entertainment News Headlines – Yahoo! News





Title Post: ‘Downton,’ ‘Girls,’ ‘Idol’ and more this January
Url Post: http://www.news.fluser.com/downton-girls-idol-and-more-this-january/
Link To Post : ‘Downton,’ ‘Girls,’ ‘Idol’ and more this January
Rating:
100%

based on 99998 ratings.
5 user reviews.
Author: Fluser SeoLink
Thanks for visiting the blog, If any criticism and suggestions please leave a comment




Read More..

Oil Sand Industry in Canada Tied to Higher Carcinogen Level


Todd Korol/Reuters


An oil sands mine Fort McMurray, Alberta.







OTTAWA — The development of Alberta’s oil sands has increased levels of cancer-causing compounds in surrounding lakes well beyond natural levels, Canadian researchers reported in a study released on Monday. And they said the contamination covered a wider area than had previously been believed.




For the study, financed by the Canadian government, the researchers set out to develop a historical record of the contamination, analyzing sediment dating back about 50 years from six small and shallow lakes north of Fort McMurray, Alberta, the center of the oil sands industry. Layers of the sediment were tested for deposits of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, groups of chemicals associated with oil that in many cases have been found to cause cancer in humans after long-term exposure.


“One of the biggest challenges is that we lacked long-term data,” said John P. Smol, the paper’s lead author and a professor of biology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario. “So some in industry have been saying that the pollution in the tar sands is natural, it’s always been there.”


The researchers found that to the contrary, the levels of those deposits have been steadily rising since large-scale oil sands production began in 1978.


Samples from one test site, the paper said, now show 2.5 to 23 times more PAHs in current sediment than in layers dating back to around 1960.


“We’re not saying these are poisonous ponds,” Professor Smol said. “But it’s going to get worse. It’s not too late but the trend is not looking good.” He said that the wilderness lakes studied by the group were now contaminated as much as lakes in urban centers.


The study is likely to provide further ammunition to critics of the industry, who already contend that oil extracted from Canada’s oil sands poses environmental hazards like toxic sludge ponds, greenhouse gas emissions and the destruction of boreal forests.


Battles are also under way over the proposed construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would move the oil down through the western United States and down to refineries along the Gulf Coast, or an alternative pipeline that would transport the oil from landlocked Alberta to British Columbia for export to Asia.


The researchers, who included scientists at Environment Canada’s aquatic contaminants research division, chose to test for PAHs because they had been the subject of earlier studies, including one published in 2009 that analyzed the distribution of the chemicals in snowfall north of Fort McMurray. That research drew criticism from the government of Alberta and others for failing to provide a historical baseline.


“Now we have the smoking gun,” Professor Smol said.


He said he was not surprised that the analysis found a rise in PAH deposits after the industrial development of the oil sands, “but we needed the data.” He said he had not entirely expected, however, to observe the effect at the most remote test site, a lake that is about 50 miles to the north.


Asked about the study, Adam Sweet, a spokesman for Peter Kent, Canada’s environment minister, emphasized in an e-mail that with the exception of one lake very close to the oil sands, the levels of contaminants measured by the researchers “did not exceed Canadian guidelines and were low compared to urban areas.”


He added that an environmental monitoring program for the region announced last February 2012 was put into effect “to address the very concerns raised by such studies” and to “provide an improved understanding of the long-term cumulative effects of oil sands development.”


Earlier research has suggested several different ways that the chemicals could spread. Most oil sand production involve large-scale open-pit mining. The chemicals may become wind-borne when giant excavators dig them up and then deposit them into 400-ton dump trucks.


Upgraders at some oil sands projects that separate the oil bitumen from its surrounding sand are believed to emit PAHs. And some scientists believe that vast ponds holding wastewater from that upgrading and from other oil sand processes may be leaking PAHs and other chemicals into downstream bodies of water.


Read More..

DealBook: JPMorgan's Staley to Join BlueMountain Capital

James E. Staley, a longtime JPMorgan Chase executive who served as the firm’s head of investment banking until this summer, is leaving the bank to join BlueMountain Capital Management as a managing partner, the hedge fund said on Tuesday.

The firm he is joining, a nine-year-old hedge fund with $12 billion in assets, profited from betting against JPMorgan by taking the other side of a bet on corporate debt that eventually cost the bank billions of dollars in May. The hedge fund then helped the Wall Street firm clear out its positions through another series of trades.

Mr. Staley’s departure from JPMorgan ends a 34-year career at the bank, which stretched back to the original J.P. Morgan & Company. He worked in a wide variety of roles, from the Brazilian office to the head of the equity capital markets and syndicate divisions to the head of wealth management.

Mr. Staley, an avid sailor known to most as Jes, became the chief executive of investment banking in fall 2009, presiding over the division’s expansion in the wake of the financial crisis.

But several months after the disclosure of the trading loss, JPMorgan shook up its management team. It gave Mr. Staley the new title of head of corporate and investment banking. To some inside the bank, the move effectively sidelined him in a position that was more symbolic than substantive.

At BlueMountain, Mr. Staley will be the firm’s ninth managing partner and will join the management, risk and investment committees. He will also buy an undisclosed stake in the firm.

“I’m very excited to be joining BlueMountain at a time when sea changes in the financial industry, combined with the firm’s unique strengths, open up enormous possibilities to deliver value to clients,” Mr. Staley said in a statement. “I want to thank all my colleagues at JPMorgan, my home for the last 34 years, and I look forward to working with them in the future.”

JPMorgan Chase’s chief, Jamie Dimon, sent a memo to employees on Tuesday morning:

To: All Senior Managers
From: Jamie Dimon
Subject: Jes Staley

This morning it was announced that our colleague, Jes Staley, will be leaving JPMorgan Chase to join BlueMountain Capital Management as a Managing Partner and Member of its Management Committee. Attached is BlueMountain’s press release.

Jes has been an extraordinary leader and a valued partner for many of us at JPMorgan over the years. He joined our company more than 34 years ago, and during this time he served in many critical management roles, including head of our Investment Bank, Asset Management group, Private Bank, and as one of the founders of our equities business. He has served our firm with distinction as a member of our firmwide Operating Committee, and he has been a trusted mentor to many people at our company.

While Jes is leaving JPMorgan Chase, he is joining a respected private investment firm, BlueMountain Capital. BlueMountain is an important client of ours, and we look forward to working with Jes in the future. Please join me in thanking Jes for his decades of dedicated service to JPMorgan, and in wishing him and his family all the best in the future.

Jamie

Read More..